Wood- instruments, acoustic guitars
Laminate versus Solid Wood
When
reading about acoustic guitars, you may have noticed that cheaper
instruments tend to be made of laminated wood, whilst more expensive
guitars tend to be made from solid wood.
In
a nutshell, an all-laminated body guitar, the top, back and sides will
be made from layered (laminated) pieces of wood, most typically
laminated spruce for the top, and laminated mahogany for the back and
sides.
Solid
wood construction means that the guitar is made from solid sheets of
wood. Usually, the top and back of an all-solid construction body will
be made by joining two solid sheets each to form the top and back, with
the join down the centre-line.
The
main advantage of using solid wood is that it is far more resonant, and
thus has far better tone than a laminate guitar. In addition, many
solid tonewoods (particularly spruce) improves over time as the wood
dries out and becomes even more resonant. However, solid wood is far
harder to work with, and more expensive, making solid guitars more
expensive.
Laminated
wood is relatively inexpensive, and cheaper to work with, and so is a
sensible option to keep costs down. However, whilst solid body guitars
often improve in tonal quality over time, laminated guitars will
eventually deteriorate (although this is over quite a period of time –
don’t panic!).
Generally,
solid construction is better. Guitars are available with solid tops and
laminated back and sides, making an economical compromise between price
and tone, too.
Spruce
Spruce
is the most popular wood used for guitar tops, and recognisable by its
pale colour and (usually) understated figuring. The reason for its
popularity is because it has a tone that makes it a very good
‘all-rounder’. Sweet, and smooth, but not outrageously bright, yet with
enough warmth such that it doesn’t sound thin, Spruce sounds good when
combined with just about any other tonewood. In addition, it also has
pretty good projection and volume to boot.
Spruce
is a common species of wood, adding to its guitar material credentials.
Sitka spruce is the most commonly found type, with grain varieties such
as ‘bear claw’ adding to the aesthetic appeal. Sitka is characterised
by is clear fundamental harmonics.
Engleman
spruce is typically from North America, and has a warmer, creamier tone
than Sitka. Adirondack is a lesser-used type of Spruce, with a louder
and brasher tone.
Cedar
Cedar
is probably the second most popular material for guitar tops, and can
generally spotted by a colour that tends more towards a red-brown.
When
compared to spruce, cedar is lot less dense. This makes it quieter,
less bright, with less sustain. The upshot, however, is that Cedar is
much warmer, and takes less time to reach its full tonal potential.
As a result, Cedar is a popular choice with finger-style players.
Mahogany
Mahogany
is probably the most popular choice of tonewood for guitar backs and
sides, though it’s also occasionally used as a top material, too.
Mahogany is a dense wood, with a dark finish, and close grain. Tonally,
it has far warmer, darker tone than both Cedar and Spruce.
As
a material for back and sides, mahogany’s density can add great ‘punch’
and projection, adding warmth, but with definition, and a ‘woody’
character.
The
combination of spruce and mahogany and spruce is one of the most
popular, because it offers a tone that very balanced, but versatile,
lending itself very well to most musical styles.
Maple
Though
far less common as a tonewood, Maple nonetheless features on some of
the most popular acoustic guitars ever made (the Gibson J-200, for
example). One of the hardest and most dense tonewood varieties, maple is
famed for its bright tone, and great projection, with excellent note
definition.
All
maple acoustic guitars, and maple tops are not common, but maple back
and sides are more so, often adding greater power and mid-range to a
more typical top material.
The dramatic figuring can also add a stunning aesthetic touch to a guitar, too.
Rosewood
As
one of the most expensive tonewood varieties, Rosewood has a lot to
live up to. However, with its smooth, warm tone, with complex harmonic
overtones. Visually, Rosewood is typically a dark, chocolate brown in
colour, with a widely banded dark grain, and is generally used as a
material for the back and sides of a guitar body.
Combined with a Spruce top, Rosewood provides an incredibly balanced and versatile palette of tones.
Indian
Rosewood is one of the most desirable (and expensive) tonewoods, with
warm, but singing harmonics. Brazilian Rosewood has a slightly brighter,
less complex tone, with a defined low-end.
Metal- instruments like brass
Aluminum
- Sound travels at one of the fastest rates through aluminum, at 6,320 meters per second. This is because aluminum is not particularly dense--meaning that it has little mass in a given volume--and is extremely elastic and capable of changing shape easily. Note that a material's elasticity tends to fluctuate more than its density and is therefore considered more important for understanding the speed of sound through the given material.
Copper
- The next-fastest speed for sound is 4,600 meters per second in copper. With its elasticity and thus ability to vibrate in place easily, sound travels through quickly. However, it is much more dense than aluminum, which explains why it is nearly two-thirds slower than aluminum.
Plastics-
Plastic
material Velocity long.
meter/sec Density
g/qcm Acoustic Impedance
Attenuation
dB/cm, 5MHz or []
ABS, beige 2230 1.03 2.31 11.1
ABS, black 2250 1.05 2.36 10.9
ABS, grey 2170 1.07 2.32 11.3
Acrylic, clear 2750 1.19 3.26 6.4
Acrylic,M1-7 2610 1.18 3.08 12.4
Bakelit 1590 1.40 3.63 -
CelluloseButyrate 2140 1.19 2.56 21.9
Delrin, black 2430 1.42 3.45 30.3
Ethyl vinil acetat 18% Acet. 1800 0.94 1.69 -
Ethyl vinil acetat 28% Acet. 1680 0.95 1.60 -
PVC Acrylic Alloy Sheet 2218 1.35 2.99 -
Polycarbonat Lexan 2300 1.20 2.75 23.2
Lustran, SAN 2510 1.06 2.68 5.1
Mylar 2540 1.18 3.00 -
Kodar PETG Copolyester 2340 1.27 2.97 20.0
Melopas 2900 1.70 4.93 7.2 [2.5]
Nylon, 6/6 2600 1.12 2.90 2.9
Nylon, black, 6/6 2770 1.14 3.15 16.0
Polycarbonate, black 2270 1.22 2.77 22.1
Polycarbonate, blue 2260 1.20 2.72 23.5
Polycarbonate, clear 2270 1.18 2.69 24.9
Polyethylene 1950 0.90 1.73 -
Polyethylene, high density 2430 0.96 2.33 -
Polyethylene, low density 1950 0.92 1.79 2.4
Polyethylene oxide 2250 1.21 2.72 -
Polypropylene, Profax 2740 0.88 2.40 5.1
Polypropylene, white 2660 0.89 2.36 18.2
Polystrene "Fostarene 50" 2450 1.04 - -
Polystrene "Lustrex" 2320 1.04 2.42 3.6
Polystrene, Styron 666 2400 1.05 2.52 1.8
Polyvinyl butyral 2350 1.11 2.60 -
PSO, Polysulfone 2240 1.24 2.78 4.25 [2]
PVC, grey 2380 1.38 3.27 11.2
Styrene Butadiene 1920 1.02 1.95 24.3
Dimethyl pentene Polymer 2200 0.83 1.84 3.8[1.3]4.4[4]
Valox, black, glass filled Nylon 2530 1.52 3.83 15.7
Vinyl, Rigid 2230 1.33 2.96 12.8
material Velocity long.
meter/sec Density
g/qcm Acoustic Impedance
Attenuation
dB/cm, 5MHz or []
ABS, beige 2230 1.03 2.31 11.1
ABS, black 2250 1.05 2.36 10.9
ABS, grey 2170 1.07 2.32 11.3
Acrylic, clear 2750 1.19 3.26 6.4
Acrylic,M1-7 2610 1.18 3.08 12.4
Bakelit 1590 1.40 3.63 -
CelluloseButyrate 2140 1.19 2.56 21.9
Delrin, black 2430 1.42 3.45 30.3
Ethyl vinil acetat 18% Acet. 1800 0.94 1.69 -
Ethyl vinil acetat 28% Acet. 1680 0.95 1.60 -
PVC Acrylic Alloy Sheet 2218 1.35 2.99 -
Polycarbonat Lexan 2300 1.20 2.75 23.2
Lustran, SAN 2510 1.06 2.68 5.1
Mylar 2540 1.18 3.00 -
Kodar PETG Copolyester 2340 1.27 2.97 20.0
Melopas 2900 1.70 4.93 7.2 [2.5]
Nylon, 6/6 2600 1.12 2.90 2.9
Nylon, black, 6/6 2770 1.14 3.15 16.0
Polycarbonate, black 2270 1.22 2.77 22.1
Polycarbonate, blue 2260 1.20 2.72 23.5
Polycarbonate, clear 2270 1.18 2.69 24.9
Polyethylene 1950 0.90 1.73 -
Polyethylene, high density 2430 0.96 2.33 -
Polyethylene, low density 1950 0.92 1.79 2.4
Polyethylene oxide 2250 1.21 2.72 -
Polypropylene, Profax 2740 0.88 2.40 5.1
Polypropylene, white 2660 0.89 2.36 18.2
Polystrene "Fostarene 50" 2450 1.04 - -
Polystrene "Lustrex" 2320 1.04 2.42 3.6
Polystrene, Styron 666 2400 1.05 2.52 1.8
Polyvinyl butyral 2350 1.11 2.60 -
PSO, Polysulfone 2240 1.24 2.78 4.25 [2]
PVC, grey 2380 1.38 3.27 11.2
Styrene Butadiene 1920 1.02 1.95 24.3
Dimethyl pentene Polymer 2200 0.83 1.84 3.8[1.3]4.4[4]
Valox, black, glass filled Nylon 2530 1.52 3.83 15.7
Vinyl, Rigid 2230 1.33 2.96 12.8
Wood- good for instruments
Metal- aluminum and copper best for speed of sound
Plastic- about half the speed of metals
To make this product more effective to have a home theater kind of function the use of acoustic sound would be most cost effective and that certain style that people will enjoy. When sound hits something such as a wall, the energy or the sound will bounce off of the wall and go through it or be absorbed by it. The sound mostly comes back off the wall because that is the easiest way for the energy to go rather than having to work it’s way through the surface. A surface that is concave will produce a more focused reflected sound.
This is because the sound waves hit the concave surface, the angle will bounce the waves back inward and concentrate the sound to a specific point. If the surface were flat, the sound would bounce back and continue to expand outward and the sound would dissipate. If the surface were convex, it would further push the sound waves outward, creating even less of a concentrated sound, which would be noticeably quieter to the ear, and it would not be as crisp.
To make this product more effective to have a home theater kind of function the use of acoustic sound would be most cost effective and that certain style that people will enjoy. When sound hits something such as a wall, the energy or the sound will bounce off of the wall and go through it or be absorbed by it. The sound mostly comes back off the wall because that is the easiest way for the energy to go rather than having to work it’s way through the surface. A surface that is concave will produce a more focused reflected sound.
This is because the sound waves hit the concave surface, the angle will bounce the waves back inward and concentrate the sound to a specific point. If the surface were flat, the sound would bounce back and continue to expand outward and the sound would dissipate. If the surface were convex, it would further push the sound waves outward, creating even less of a concentrated sound, which would be noticeably quieter to the ear, and it would not be as crisp.
No comments:
Post a Comment